Nawres Hamid: the American fatality that nearly resulted in war between Iran and the US

28 December, 2020
Nawres Hamid: the American fatality that nearly resulted in war between Iran and the US
At first, the strike on the afternoon of December 27, 2019, on a joint Iraqi-US foundation in Kirkuk referred to as “K-1” may not have seemed unusual - at least not in the context of violence in Iraq, following the defeat of ISIS.

A large number of similar attacks had been launched since the winter of 2018, initially on the US embassy and later on American bases.

Lots of the rocket attacks were from the Iran-backed Iraqi militia group, Kataib Hezbollah.

Until that day time, the rocket attacks, although nerve-rattling, had not caused US casualties.

But Kataib Hezbollah had plainly broken its truce with US and international coalition forces, alongside which it fought between 2008 and 2011.

US troops, having returned to Iraq at the invitation of the Iraqi government to combat ISIS, were again being singled out by the militia as an occupier, just after a shaky arrangement to hold off hostilities until ISIS were defeated.

Until that afternoon in December, inaccurate rocket attacks had often can be found in small salvos.

It was as though the militias intentionally avoided escalation, using the attacks as being a note: ISIS has truly gone, now leave.

After some specifically inaccurate attacks, most Americans believed the rockets were fired to miss deliberately.

But as the dust settled in December 27, it had been sharp something had profoundly changed.

Thirty rockets, an unusually large number, rained straight down, killing Iraqi-American contractor Nawres Hamid.

Hamid, a good civilian contractor, have been working as a good linguist with US troops.

He moved to Sacramento, California, from Iraq in 2011, and left out a wife and several sons, aged 8 and 2.

But unlike the deaths of a huge selection of Americans before him found in Iraq, Hamid’s killing would nearly spark a regional war.

Building hatred
In the summer of 2019, Kataib Hezbollah’s innovator Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis, the top of militia umbrella organisation the favorite Mobilisation Forces, blamed US warplanes for air strikes on his males in Syria.

Those attacks, targeted at pro-Iran militia groups suspected of moving missiles into Syria to threaten Israel, were probably conducted by Israel. The US said it was not involved.

But Al Muhandis warned the Us citizens on June 28 that his men would not remain silent if even more attacks occurred.

Kataib Hezbollah had been accused of murdering Iraqi civilians found in sectarian violence, and down the road, a national protest movement that commenced in October 2019.

They attacked US troops a huge selection of times from 2008 to 2011, the worst of which was in the summer of 2011 as American occurrence reduced in Iraq.

Rockets fired by Kataib Hezbollah killed 15 American soldiers that summer time. For Washington, Al Muhandis possessed become a marked man.

He was reportedly tracked by US intelligence, even in meetings with Iranian general Qassem Suleimani, in which the two commanders helped to direct resources to an array of pro-Iran militias.

Al Muhandis and media stations associated with Kataib Hezbollah had been spreading propaganda that the US had created ISIS.

As he and the PMF intensified attacks on the US, an assault on November 8 was a sign of that which was to come.

Seventeen rockets were fired at the Iraqi-US base in Qayyara, south of Mosul. By sheer luck, there have been no casualties.

By early on December attacks were increasing. On December 9, rockets had been fired at an Iraqi-US basic in Baghdad airport, injuring five Iraqi counter-terrorism soldiers.

“The quantity of rockets being shot in a single volley is increasing,” a US official told Reuters at that time.

The official said that Iran-backed groups were approaching a red collection and if it were crossed, “no-one will like the results”.

Mark Esper, then US secretary of defence, said on December 16 that “Iran should not mistake the United Says’ restraint for a great unwillingness to respond with decisive military force”.

Less than two weeks later, Hamid was dead and the US was first primed to respond.

On December 30, air strikes hit Kataib Hezbollah positions near to the Syrian border, killing at least 25 of the militants.

Within times, the PMF had the US embassy surrounded by a large number of people.

What happened up coming is disputed. The US said it received cleverness that Al Muhandis, who possessed travelled to Baghdad airport terminal to meet up Suleimani, was planning a retaliatory strike on the Americans.

The US killed both men on January 3 in a drone strike near to the airport.

Iran’s response was a volley of ballistic missiles fired at several joint US-Iraqi bases in January 7 in a far larger attack than anything seen until that point. It wounded 100 Us citizens.

US President Donald Trump desisted from further more escalation, perhaps satisfied that enough destruction had been done.

In Sacramento, Hamid’s widow was devastated.

“He was the only person I realized here," Noor Alkhalili told regional paper The Sacramento Bee.

"It has been difficult to simply accept that he is no more here.”

The US response to the death of an American citizen last year points to a dangerous path in advance.

Once again, Kataib Hezbollah and their PMF allies are warning the US that attacks will continue, even while Washington has said, since it did late this past year, that its forces might defend themselves.

As the anniversary of the deaths of Al Muhandis and Suleimani approaches on January 3, the danger now could be that history will do it again itself. 
Source: www.thenationalnews.com
Search - Nextnews24.com
Share On:
Nextnews24 - Archive